Block 8, Article 7 — One in Three in 1955. One in Ten Today.
In 1955 one in three American workers belonged to a union. Today it’s one in ten.
That did not happen because workers stopped wanting what unions produce. It happened because unions were identified as a threat, targeted by a fifty-year institutional project, and systematically dismantled through legislation, judicial appointments, regulatory capture, and executive action. The Powell Memo named organized labor explicitly. The apparatus that followed executed on that identification with the same patience it brought to every other element of the capture.
— — —
Why Powell put labor on the list
Unions were not on Powell’s list because they raised wages. They were on it because they were the only organized political force in America that matched corporate institutional capacity and was not corporate.
A unionized workforce does not just negotiate contracts. It funds candidates. It turns out voters. It organizes at the precinct level. It runs its own research operations and legal teams. In 1955, when union membership peaked at 35% of the workforce, the labor movement was the single largest source of organized political opposition to concentrated corporate power in the United States. The Chamber of Commerce understood this. Powell made it explicit. You cannot build permanent structural advantage in the legislative and regulatory rooms while a countervailing force of that scale is organized, funded, and showing up.
Wages were a secondary concern. Political capacity was the target.
— — —
The sequence that ran it down
The first blow had already landed before Powell wrote a word. The Taft-Hartley Act of 1947 prohibited secondary boycotts and sympathy strikes — the tools that made labor solidarity across industries possible. A union could no longer shut down a supplier to support a strike at a manufacturer. The legislation passed over Truman’s veto. Its stated purpose was labor peace. Its operational effect was to isolate each bargaining unit from every other, making the collective power of organized labor structurally unavailable at the scale that made it politically significant.
Right-to-work legislation extended Taft-Hartley’s logic state by state. Workers in a unionized shop could receive union-negotiated wages and benefits without paying union dues. The free rider problem was not an accident of the legislation. It was the mechanism. Defund the union through compelled free ridership, then point to declining membership as evidence that workers don’t want unions. ALEC wrote the model legislation. Twenty-six states have passed versions of it — down from twenty-seven after Michigan repealed its own right-to-work law in February 2024, the first state reversal of one in nearly sixty years, though Michigan’s public-sector workers remain protected by a separate federal constitutional right established in the Supreme Court’s 2018 Janus ruling.
Right-to-work was framed as protecting a worker’s freedom not to join a union. The defunding mechanism the free-rider provision was specifically built to trigger — not the freedom being advertised — was not in the frame.
The signal moment was August 5, 1981. Ronald Reagan fired 11,000 striking air traffic controllers — members of the Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization, PATCO — and banned them from federal employment for life. The strike was illegal — federal employees cannot strike — and Reagan’s action was legally available to him. What it communicated to every private employer in America was the message that mattered: the federal government would not enforce labor law against union-busting. The NLRB, the agency created to protect workers’ right to organize, began its long shift toward employer interests through the appointment of board members by administrations funded by the industries the board regulates. The board that was built to be the referee started calling fouls only in one direction.
The result is documented. Union membership: 35% in 1955. 20% by 1983. 12% by 2000. 10% today. Private sector membership is 6%.
— — —
What the productivity-pay gap tells you
Since 1979 American worker productivity has increased approximately 90%. Worker compensation over the same period has increased approximately 33%. The gap between what workers produce and what they are paid for producing it is not a market outcome. It is a policy outcome — the direct result of the sequence above. When the countervailing institutional force that bargained the relationship between productivity and pay was systematically removed, the relationship between productivity and pay changed. The math is not complicated. The mechanism is documented.
The people who built the apparatus understood this perfectly. Publicly the argument was always about markets, efficiency, and the freedom of workers to choose. Privately — in the memos, in the strategy documents, in the donor calls — the argument was about power. Who sets the price of labor. Who controls the terms. Who shows up to the room where those decisions are made.
— — —
The tell is in what the apparatus does not oppose
Prison labor in the United States pays between $0.23 and $1.15 per hour. UNICOR — the federal prison industry program — competes directly with private manufacturers in metal fabrication, electronics assembly, and garment production. The metal stamping company that loses a contract to a federal prison program cannot get the Chamber of Commerce to take its case. The garment manufacturer competing against prison labor gets no ALEC white paper about market distortion. The think tanks that produce arguments about minimum wage increases harming small business have not produced arguments about UNICOR harming small business.
The market competition argument is deployed selectively: against arrangements that raise the price of labor, silent when the arrangement eliminates the price of labor entirely. The argument was never about markets. It was about who sets the price. Prison labor does not threaten that project. It completes it.
— — —
Neither party is clean
The Powell apparatus built the legislative and judicial infrastructure of union destruction. The Democratic Party, when it discovered the same donor infrastructure was available to it, chose accommodation over dismantlement. Bill Clinton signed NAFTA in 1994 over the explicit opposition of organized labor — the trade agreement that accelerated manufacturing job loss and with it the industrial union base that had been the core of Democratic political power since the New Deal. The party that had built its majority on union households decided the donor class was a more reliable foundation. The union households noticed. The party’s working-class coalition did not collapse overnight. It eroded over thirty years and accelerated in 2016.
One sentence. It belongs in the record. It will not be repeated.
— — —
The current administration is running the PATCO play on the federal workforce
In early 2026, DOGE-directed mass firings removed tens of thousands of federal workers from agencies across the government — more than 20,000 USDA employees alone between January and June 2025, nearly three-quarters of them through a deferred-resignation program. The Farm Service Agency’s front-line county staff — the people who process farm loans, disaster payments, and conservation program applications in person — were cut 8 percent in 2025 alone. More than a third of FSA county offices lost staff; forty-two of them started 2026 with no FSA county employee at all. Multiple agencies then began quietly rehiring — not the workers they had fired, but new workers, without the same civil service protections, without the institutional knowledge the fired workers carried. The pattern was not incompetence. It was recomposition: remove the workforce with protections and institutional memory, replace it with a workforce that has neither.
Reagan fired the air traffic controllers and told private employers the rules had changed. The current administration is firing the federal workforce and rebuilding it without the civil service architecture that made federal employment a model of stable, protected public service. The signal is the same. The target is different. The method is identical.
The workforce that arrives at the AI displacement moment — documented in Block 11 — has 6% private sector union membership, no meaningful right to strike in most industries, a federal labor board whose composition tracks the administration that appointed it, and a wage floor set by a minimum wage that has not been raised since 2009. The apparatus that was built to control the price of labor has been running for fifty years. It has largely achieved its objective.
— — —
The federal minimum wage has not moved since 2009
The same Congress is moving to raise its own pay. Members currently earn $174,000 annually. The minimum wage worker earns $15,080 at full-time hours. The gap between what the people in the room pay themselves and what they allow the floor to be is not a data point. It is the argument made visible.
The productivity gains that didn’t go to workers went somewhere. They went to capital — to the shareholders of the corporations that extracted the labor surplus the same way the apparatus extracted the mineral surplus: at below-market rates, protected by the regulatory and legislative architecture the apparatus spent fifty years building. The worker whose union was dismantled and the aquifer whose royalty rate was frozen in 1920 are entries on the same ledger. Block 10 shows the total.
The outcome of this mechanism lives in Block 10. The convergence it feeds lives in Block 11.
— — —
Look up the National Labor Relations Board’s current composition and the industries the appointing administration’s largest donors work in. Both are public record.
— — —
Steve Sagnotti
is a serious amateur photographer, writer, and technologist based in Oregon. With his camera he tries to capture common images not often seen, leading to common questions not often asked.
© 2026 Steve Sagnotti
— — —
Sources
1. Bureau of Labor Statistics. “Union Members Summary.” bls.gov
2. Labor Management Relations Act (Taft-Hartley). Pub.L. 80-101. 1947. congress.gov
3. PATCO firing, August 1981.
4. ALEC. “Right to Work Act.” alec.org
5. Economic Policy Institute. “The Productivity–Pay Gap.” epi.org
6. UNICOR/Federal Prison Industries wage rates. unicor.gov
7. NAFTA. North American Free Trade Agreement. January 1, 1994. ustr.gov
8. FedTools. “Federal Agencies Re-Hiring After DOGE Cuts: The Boomerang.” March 31, 2026.
9. Federal News Network. “Big, Beautiful Bill gives new feds a choice: job security or lower pension contributions.” June 11, 2025. federalnewsnetwork.com
10. Mayer, Jane. Dark Money. Doubleday, 2016.
11. Drutman, Lee. The Business of America Is Lobbying. Oxford University Press, 2015.
Leave a Reply